Ardour vs Audacity with Guitarix and IRs
Moderators: MattKingUSA, khz
-
- Established Member
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:37 pm
- Location: Rome, Italy
Ardour vs Audacity with Guitarix and IRs
Hi all,
I'm facing a different result from Ardour respect Audacity, about recording electric guitar: those made on Ardour is boxxy and artificial.
Why?
The whole story is I'm trying to properly setup recording electric guitar with old Mesa Boogie tube amp and IRs, in GNU/Linux environment of course
A DAW would be better for the project, so Ardour was the choice.
Signal routing is:
Ibanez e-guitar -> Mesa tube head -> Suhr reactive load 8ohm -> Alesis io2 usb sound card -> Dell XPS laptop Ubuntu 18.04 LTS -> Qjackctl -> Guitarix 0.36.1-1 -> Convolver mono loading Ownhammer impulse responses 4x12 cabinet Mesa Boogie -> Convolver stereo loading another OH IR 4x12.
When I play live on this system the sound is absolutely in real time and amazing, heard by AKG K240 headphones. Never appreciated so well this chain at home before.
When I record on Ardour sounds is not good anymore, boxxy and artificial as said above. So I tried with Audacity: definitely better than Ardour, I can say next to live situation (just the amazing guitarix).
Samples:
https://soundcloud.com/user-36178041/se ... est_ubuntu
Routing inside Jack is:
system capture -> gx head in -> gx head out -> gx fx in -> gx fx out -> ardour track to record -> system output
In case of Audacity gx fx selected as input and system as output
Thank you all GNU/Linux musicians
Gianpietro
I'm facing a different result from Ardour respect Audacity, about recording electric guitar: those made on Ardour is boxxy and artificial.
Why?
The whole story is I'm trying to properly setup recording electric guitar with old Mesa Boogie tube amp and IRs, in GNU/Linux environment of course
A DAW would be better for the project, so Ardour was the choice.
Signal routing is:
Ibanez e-guitar -> Mesa tube head -> Suhr reactive load 8ohm -> Alesis io2 usb sound card -> Dell XPS laptop Ubuntu 18.04 LTS -> Qjackctl -> Guitarix 0.36.1-1 -> Convolver mono loading Ownhammer impulse responses 4x12 cabinet Mesa Boogie -> Convolver stereo loading another OH IR 4x12.
When I play live on this system the sound is absolutely in real time and amazing, heard by AKG K240 headphones. Never appreciated so well this chain at home before.
When I record on Ardour sounds is not good anymore, boxxy and artificial as said above. So I tried with Audacity: definitely better than Ardour, I can say next to live situation (just the amazing guitarix).
Samples:
https://soundcloud.com/user-36178041/se ... est_ubuntu
Routing inside Jack is:
system capture -> gx head in -> gx head out -> gx fx in -> gx fx out -> ardour track to record -> system output
In case of Audacity gx fx selected as input and system as output
Thank you all GNU/Linux musicians
Gianpietro
- funkmuscle
- Established Member
- Posts: 2812
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 2:30 pm
- Has thanked: 132 times
- Been thanked: 34 times
Re: Ardour vs Audacity with Guitarix and IRs
That is weird. I connect from:
Guitar > Mooer Brown Sound preamp > Hotone CAB> Focusrite 2i2.
The Hotone does a microphone, Poweramp and cabinets simulator. I can load my own IR files on it.
No matter what I recorded it sounds exactly the same.
When I use Guitarix, I bypass everything and just connect my guitar to the sound interface and I get a really great sounding app that way too.
From how I'm interpreting what you're saying there, you're going from an amplifier(Boogie) into a load box back into an amplifier(Guitarix).
Since you using the load box you're capturing both the preamp and the power amp of that amplifier so once you've connected to your interface, you should just use Qjackctl or Cadence with its patchbay to Route to the IR loader. That's my other way when I just use the Mooer preamp with it's built-in IR cab simulator turned off.
I'm still wondering if because you're going from the amplifier to the load box into your interface and into the software amplifier if that's not causing that. As of how the different software records it, that's still a mystery.
Guitar > Mooer Brown Sound preamp > Hotone CAB> Focusrite 2i2.
The Hotone does a microphone, Poweramp and cabinets simulator. I can load my own IR files on it.
No matter what I recorded it sounds exactly the same.
When I use Guitarix, I bypass everything and just connect my guitar to the sound interface and I get a really great sounding app that way too.
From how I'm interpreting what you're saying there, you're going from an amplifier(Boogie) into a load box back into an amplifier(Guitarix).
Since you using the load box you're capturing both the preamp and the power amp of that amplifier so once you've connected to your interface, you should just use Qjackctl or Cadence with its patchbay to Route to the IR loader. That's my other way when I just use the Mooer preamp with it's built-in IR cab simulator turned off.
I'm still wondering if because you're going from the amplifier to the load box into your interface and into the software amplifier if that's not causing that. As of how the different software records it, that's still a mystery.
-
- Established Member
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:37 pm
- Location: Rome, Italy
Re: Ardour vs Audacity with Guitarix and IRs
I had not thought about it before. Another possibility to improve the whole sound aside the main issueonce you've connected to your interface, you should just use Qjackctl or Cadence with its patchbay to Route to the IR loader
In fact I used Guitarix just as IR loader since I set null its preamp and gain, just the master volume at h11 to hear something .
I could try without GX but, if any, which IR loader (stand-alone?) do you suggest?
I used some IR loaders as plugin within Ardour but the best result has always been achieved with Ardour no plugin + GX convolvers.
Thanks
- funkmuscle
- Established Member
- Posts: 2812
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 2:30 pm
- Has thanked: 132 times
- Been thanked: 34 times
Re: Ardour vs Audacity with Guitarix and IRs
Guitarix sounds great on it's own. I'd leave that as it's own amp.gianbulls23 wrote:I had not thought about it before. Another possibility to improve the whole sound aside the main issueonce you've connected to your interface, you should just use Qjackctl or Cadence with its patchbay to Route to the IR loader
In fact I used Guitarix just as IR loader since I set null its preamp and gain, just the master volume at h11 to hear something .
I could try without GX but, if any, which IR loader (stand-alone?) do you suggest?
I used some IR loaders as plugin within Ardour but the best result has always been achieved with Ardour no plugin + GX convolvers.
Thanks
for IR loader, install x42-plugins. it have some IR loaders made for cab sims
-
- Established Member
- Posts: 528
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 9:07 pm
- Has thanked: 88 times
- Been thanked: 23 times
Re: Ardour vs Audacity with Guitarix and IRs
Indeed, I would not use Guitarix just as an IR loader! It's *great* for practicing and playing when you don't want to turn on the whole rig, but there are better tools if you just want an IR loader.
IR loaders: as funkmuscle says, x42's (http://libremusicproduction.com/tools/convolv2) should do just fine. LSP has one with more bells and whistles (http://lsp-plug.in/?page=manuals). Finally, there is the IR.lv2 (https://tomszilagyi.github.io/plugins/ir.lv2/).
IR loaders: as funkmuscle says, x42's (http://libremusicproduction.com/tools/convolv2) should do just fine. LSP has one with more bells and whistles (http://lsp-plug.in/?page=manuals). Finally, there is the IR.lv2 (https://tomszilagyi.github.io/plugins/ir.lv2/).
- funkmuscle
- Established Member
- Posts: 2812
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 2:30 pm
- Has thanked: 132 times
- Been thanked: 34 times
Re: Ardour vs Audacity with Guitarix and IRs
Yep LSP has a built-in EQ on there IR loader so you can really shape your tone. The ir.lv2 may create headaches. I've seen that on many forums and I've experienced it myself. It used to be my go-to for using I IR reverbs but it would crash whatever DAW I'd be using.finotti wrote:Indeed, I would not use Guitarix just as an IR loader! It's *great* for practicing and playing when you don't want to turn on the whole rig, but there are better tools if you just want an IR loader.
IR loaders: as funkmuscle says, x42's (http://libremusicproduction.com/tools/convolv2) should do just fine. LSP has one with more bells and whistles (http://lsp-plug.in/?page=manuals). Finally, there is the IR.lv2 (https://tomszilagyi.github.io/plugins/ir.lv2/).
I was told on the Ardour forum not to use.
- funkmuscle
- Established Member
- Posts: 2812
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 2:30 pm
- Has thanked: 132 times
- Been thanked: 34 times
Re: Ardour vs Audacity with Guitarix and IRs
You are correct when it comes to mic'ing up the speakers of a guitar cabinet and recording it but to about 90% of us, we live in apartments and condos and even houses that are not soundproof so cranking up an amplifier to get a decent sound out of the speakers so we have to turn to these options. That's why I now they are making Hardware units not only capturing the impulse response of a speaker cabinet but they're also adding the power tube section of the amplifiers and a modeling of the microphones. They are also capturing the room sort of like when recording a drum kit they are a couple of microphones there to pick up the room.
The Hotone CAB covers that all. In fact when I picked the pedal up, I did just a raw or according of it and send it 2 a fellow guitar player and also he's a professional studio engineer and the first thing he asked me was where did I go to record my guitar.
I asked him why he was asking and he said he would like to know what amplifier I was using because he knows I don't have a head in the cabinet anymore and when I told him I set up, he swore it was an amplifier being recorded in a professional studio.
That's a cheap little unit by the way compared to something like the company Two Notes sells.
By running the Mesa Boogie through the load box into and I are loader with ir cabinets loaded, just a bit of Reverb added to the mix can create a really nice room sound.
The Hotone CAB covers that all. In fact when I picked the pedal up, I did just a raw or according of it and send it 2 a fellow guitar player and also he's a professional studio engineer and the first thing he asked me was where did I go to record my guitar.
I asked him why he was asking and he said he would like to know what amplifier I was using because he knows I don't have a head in the cabinet anymore and when I told him I set up, he swore it was an amplifier being recorded in a professional studio.
That's a cheap little unit by the way compared to something like the company Two Notes sells.
By running the Mesa Boogie through the load box into and I are loader with ir cabinets loaded, just a bit of Reverb added to the mix can create a really nice room sound.
-
- Established Member
- Posts: 2059
- Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2016 6:56 am
- Location: Kangasala, Finland
- Has thanked: 374 times
- Been thanked: 209 times
- Contact:
Re: Ardour vs Audacity with Guitarix and IRs
That might be true if you have decent amp, decent mic and somehow decent room. With small room and small budget ('Only cheapest is good enough') I would not expect getting great sound.42low wrote:Pluging always misses room. Misses the natural aspects and speaker behaver.
Plugged in always sounds less good (more flat, less deep), which afterwards should be edited with room-plugins.
I in general mic the amp. Great sounds then.
Linux veteran & Novice musician
Latest track: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ycVrgGtrBmM
-
- Established Member
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:37 pm
- Location: Rome, Italy
Re: Ardour vs Audacity with Guitarix and IRs
3 differents workarounds, fine!finotti wrote: IR loaders: as funkmuscle says, x42's (http://libremusicproduction.com/tools/convolv2) should do just fine. LSP has one with more bells and whistles (http://lsp-plug.in/?page=manuals). Finally, there is the IR.lv2 (https://tomszilagyi.github.io/plugins/ir.lv2/).
So I guess a plugin host is needed to manage them, right?
Since Ardour is NOK (at the moment), Guitarix not suggested because of the presence of a real amp, which plugin host, if any, do you suggest to load any impulse response file (.wav)?
Maybe I could try another DAW like Qtractor in order to check quality sound both playing live and recording.
I found out a list here https://wiki.linuxaudio.org/apps/categories/lv2
Carla seems to not be able to load IRs, I've just tested yesterday and found out in other thread that this feature is not available yet.
I appreciate your help, thank you
- magicalex
- Established Member
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 6:34 pm
- Has thanked: 132 times
- Been thanked: 7 times
- Contact:
Re: Ardour vs Audacity with Guitarix and IRs
You can load any of the convolver plugins mentioned into Carla and run them from there.
Various Guitarix bits and pieces here: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLt_SkqlUjG1LSjcd2SfTIjE1c24OLw7GA
-
- Established Member
- Posts: 2059
- Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2016 6:56 am
- Location: Kangasala, Finland
- Has thanked: 374 times
- Been thanked: 209 times
- Contact:
Re: Ardour vs Audacity with Guitarix and IRs
I don't think watts are relevant to audio quality. Or maybe if you try to be Motörhead. Cheap amps are cheap. I have one cheap second hand, and nothing else, I can give it a try, but I bet my Digitech multieffect and audio interface are more to my taste.42low wrote:Not great, but good enough. A 15W amp in a 3x2,5 meter (10x8ft,) room already gives enough effect to have the benefit. You would be happily surpriced if you would try, i'm sure.tavasti wrote:That might be true if you have decent amp, decent mic and somehow decent room. With small room and small budget ('Only cheapest is good enough') I would not expect getting great sound.
For amping an electric guitar no expensive mic is needed. A highly affordable 20kHz or 15kHz mic is enough. $25 new? About $10 for a used one? Bought me several of high quality and known brands (shure f.i.) for $10-15 incl cable
https://www.recordingrevolution.com/how ... under-150/42low wrote: Good quality recording gear to reach high quality productions doesn't have to cost huge piles off money if you are patient and stay alert.
I have also neighbors. Nearest 250 meters, and it is only forest dividing me from them. And they are 80 years, half deaf. I could play with any power (if not counting own family).42low wrote:BTW, do you think i have no neighbours? I do. I have to keep my 100W amp far at it's lowest volume (-s, because 2 on it) too. Can't turn it open either and if i would i roughly guess that about at least 40 houses (100 people?) would hear it
I like getting clear sound with multi effect (or guitarix), and fact that I can play any time except when family members are sleeping in room next to my office/studio. With amp, there might be more limiting factors. For example wife having telco meeting and me playing with amp would not work
Linux veteran & Novice musician
Latest track: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ycVrgGtrBmM
- sadko4u
- Established Member
- Posts: 989
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 9:03 pm
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 361 times
Re: Ardour vs Audacity with Guitarix and IRs
LSP convolvers also may be executed as a standalone JACK applications. So you actually do not need any plugin host.gianbulls23 wrote:I could try without GX but, if any, which IR loader (stand-alone?) do you suggest?
Thanks
LSP (Linux Studio Plugins) Developer and Maintainer.
-
- Established Member
- Posts: 2059
- Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2016 6:56 am
- Location: Kangasala, Finland
- Has thanked: 374 times
- Been thanked: 209 times
- Contact:
Re: Ardour vs Audacity with Guitarix and IRs
Did you actually watch the video? Mic is 44$ or something. And mic stand and pop filter were included to budget.42low wrote:He's cheating. Look at the mic he uses. That's not in the budget.tavasti wrote: https://www.recordingrevolution.com/how ... under-150/
Linux veteran & Novice musician
Latest track: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ycVrgGtrBmM
-
- Established Member
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:37 pm
- Location: Rome, Italy
Re: Ardour vs Audacity with Guitarix and IRs
No luck. As opposite to Guitarix, Carla seems not implementing the feature about loading wav file.magicalex wrote:You can load any of the convolver plugins mentioned into Carla and run them from there.
- Attachments
-
- carla_lv2_conv.png (238.56 KiB) Viewed 2102 times
-
- Established Member
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2018 5:37 pm
- Location: Rome, Italy
Re: Ardour vs Audacity with Guitarix and IRs
Great, it works! First impressions are very very good.sadko4u wrote:
LSP convolvers also may be executed as a standalone JACK applications. So you actually do not need any plugin host.
Impulse Reverb Stereo seems to be the best to fit needs of a tube amp, giving back an even more realistic sound, compressed as is from the tube amp, no more compression at a proper level of wet gain (-35db in my case)
I couldn't believe LSP is able to load up to 4 cabinets at once
I've just loaded four 4x12 Recto cabinets and also playing a Telecaster, with less gain of course, the bluesy feel it's in.
Now I'm going to test it again in order to find out the best tone as possible and then go back to the first issue, related to Ardour vs Audacity different quality recording, this time using LSP stand alone or guest within Ardour.
Thank you