LAW Distribution (base Packages): Newest or stable?

What other apps and distros do you use to round out your studio?

Moderators: MattKingUSA, khz

Post Reply
User avatar
khz
Established Member
Posts: 1648
Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2008 6:29 am
Location: German
Has thanked: 42 times
Been thanked: 92 times

LAW Distribution (base Packages): Newest or stable?

Post by khz »

Does the basic operating system make a difference in an LAW?
What kind of LAW distribution base system do you use? A "stable", "testing" or "sid" - these may be Debian names, but I think these names are transferable to all distributions - ? Check the entry in the "/etc/apt/source.list" or the path to your distribution where the source synchronization is listed.
- Do you care about the latest system packages in the distribution (~sid) which might mean a quick change of your base system, might include bugs, ... .
- Or are you using older system packages n of the distribution (~stable) which could mean slow changes to your base system, possibly with very few bugs, ... . .
It's just about the base system.

Subsequently added backports/repository/... or any other individual/new programs excluded. Is it easy to install and use these latest programs in your system ("stable", "testing" or "sid")?

What are the advantages and disadvantages of the different options for you?
. . . FZ - Does humor belongs in Music?
. . GNU/LINUX@AUDIO ~ /Wiki $ Howto.Info && GNU/Linux Debian installing >> Linux Audio Workstation LAW
  • I don't care about the freedom of speech because I have nothing to say.
User avatar
raboof
Established Member
Posts: 1855
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 11:58 am
Location: Deventer, NL
Has thanked: 50 times
Been thanked: 74 times
Contact:

Re: LAW Distribution (base Packages): Newest or stable?

Post by raboof »

khz wrote:- Do you care about the latest system packages in the distribution (~sid) which might mean a quick change of your base system, might include bugs, ... .
- Or are you using older system packages n of the distribution (~stable) which could mean slow changes to your base system, possibly with very few bugs, ... . .
It's just about the base system.
My answer is no different between LAW and general usage. I like to use recent packaged versions of software.

There are a couple of reasons for this:
- I'm not sure I believe older versions of software necessarily have less bugs. After all software development is "old bugs out, new bugs in". It is true sometimes bugfixes are 'backported' to older versions, but I think this is the exception rather than the norm.
- Having an old 'base system' might make it harder/impossible to run software that was designed for a newer 'base system'
- Last but perhaps most importantly: I think one of the big advantages of open source is that the distinction between 'users' and 'developers' blurs, and people can work closely together (discussing possible bugs/features, testing changes, perhaps sharing code) to improve the whole. Using old versions of software makes this (much) less efficient.
Post Reply