Code: Select all
ImportError: No module named qt
Moderators: MattKingUSA, khz
Code: Select all
ImportError: No module named qt
Please look at the versions of the packages .nathan wrote:Frescobaldi appears to have built correctly, however when I try to run it I get an error:Did you run into this?Code: Select all
ImportError: No module named qt
>> Is there also a possibility to play midi in a quick way? Like it was
>> > > possible in lilykde in the log?
> > Will be added Very Soon Now (TM).
It is added now in SVN. Install Subversion if not already there and:
svn co http://lilykde.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/frescobaldi
cd frescobaldi
mkdir build
cd build
cmake .. -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=$(kde4-config --exec-prefix)
make
sudo make install # or: su -c "make install"
please try: open in Frescobaldi a file with a \midi {} line inside \score { }
block, click the Run LilyPond button and watch the log. There is also a menu
entry LilyPond->Generated Files that has useful actions on the updated files
(PDF, MIDI).
best regards,
Wilbert Berendsen
Thanks for reply and suggestion, Studio. All my packages seem to be the versions that you've advised here. Any other ideas?studio32 wrote:
Please look at the versions of the packages .
python-sip4 and python-sip4-dev: 4,7,7
python-qt4 and python-qt4-dev: 4.4.3
libqt4-core/gui etc. 4.4.3
python-kde4 and -dev: 4:4.1.3
If you use the svn Frescobaldi, the midi playback works greatWhile you are inputting the notes, you can use showLastLength to only engrave the last n bars for checking. That makes it pretty quick. Eg In my present score I have
showLastLength = R1*3/4*6
which only engraves the last six bars of 3/4 time. The piece I'm working on at the moment now takes 23 seconds to build the whole score, but with showLastLength it only takes three seconds to engrave those last six bars.
Nick
Out of curiosity, what kind of features are you looking for that aren't provided by Rosegarden?nathan wrote:Rosegarden, and it's quite capable as a midi sequencer. I also think that the notation editor is really useful for examining compositions, but even with "print via Lilypond," it just doesn't have the capabilities I need for large-scale or complex scores with advanced articulations, etc.
Mostly score layout/symbol stuff...tremolo symbols for the strings, for instance, and staff groupings for full orchestra. Brackets and braces are a must! Rosegarden doesn't really handle transposing instruments. In Rosegarden, it also doesn't seem possible to force page or line breaks. Certain symbols for advanced sounds like glissadi and arppegiated chords aren't available. Of course, you can tweak the Lily output, but Rosegarden just isn't really a WYSIWYG editor. But hey, that's okay! It's a sequencer with some notation ability. Every now and then I'll use it peak at a midi file to see the music in notation, and the notation editor also comes in handy for quickly printing a simple part from MIDI.raboof wrote:Out of curiosity, what kind of features are you looking for that aren't provided by Rosegarden?