Hi everyone, this is my first post here and I feel I have to add to this discussion.
First of all, music making as it stands on linux is amazing. The sheer number of synths, effects and quirky little tools put it far in front of anything else I've seen.
I've been working with linux music for a few years, well versed in both LMMS and Jack environments. I find sketching song ideas and making a good purely electronic track a lot easier with LMMS.. all I need is my keyboard controller (or even just a mouse and keyboard.)
The modular environment becomes too difficult to work with unless you're seriously going to sit down, lay down some guitar, keys and then polish it up into a working song, spending a good part of the day doing so. Also you don't want to shut down the computer because that would require rerouting everything and reloading presets (I've had no luck with lash or ladish so far). I tried a simple MIDI-only song with chord progression and melody but the amount of work spent in setup was disproportionate to the quality of the outcome.
However there are some aspects of a modular 'wiring diagram' that would be excellent to have in an app like LMMS, especially in the handling of effects that require 2 or more sound sources (sidechaining etc.)
Basically I had this dream of the perfect linux audio app that would exclusively use JACK as a backend but still behave like an IME. It was to be a glorious merger between Ableton Live (session view, mainly, a la seq24) and LMMS. Thus I would be able to use all my synth apps like amSynth and mx44, the vast array of utilities (QMidiArp etc.) in what would be a very lightweight app because most of the functionality required was already programmed. All that needed to be handled was automation, routing and presets (ha!).
I don't know if such an app is possible, I would have thought of working on it if people hadn't told me it was an unbelievable undertaking for someone with no knowledge of audio programming (I do have some programming experience just not audio). Lots of plans and ideas were written up for it too. Perhaps it's not to anyone else's taste.
As it stands, I'll probably end up using my modular setup for any guitar-oriented songs and LMMS for fun electronic tracks. By the way, I don't think giving LMMS jack driver support would benefit it in any way simply because it's unnecessary, it literally contains everything you need with an excellent backend to boot.
In what way modular approach is limiting
Moderators: MattKingUSA, khz
-
- Established Member
- Posts: 753
- Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2008 1:12 pm
Re: In what way modular approach is limiting
Greetings and salutations. Welcome to the group.Vixus wrote:Hi everyone, this is my first post here...
I'm sure that LMMS sans JACK is fine and all, but it does not contain everything *I* need. Fortunately, Csound does.... By the way, I don't think giving LMMS jack driver support would benefit it in any way simply because it's unnecessary, it literally contains everything you need with an excellent backend to boot.
Best,
dp
- autostatic
- Established Member
- Posts: 1994
- Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 5:26 pm
- Location: Beverwijk, The Netherlands
- Has thanked: 32 times
- Been thanked: 104 times
- Contact:
Re: In what way modular approach is limiting
Hello Vixus, and welcome!Vixus wrote:By the way, I don't think giving LMMS jack driver support would benefit it in any way simply because it's unnecessary, it literally contains everything you need with an excellent backend to boot.
I can't use LMMS on my main production machine. ALSA doesn't support my Firewire card so I have to use JACK with FFADO. So in my case JACK support would be great because now I barely use LMMS anymore in favor of apps that do support JACK.
Best,
Jeremy
Re: In what way modular approach is limiting
Ah yes, I didn't consider people who would actually need jack to interface with their hardware... my apologies.
In any case I'm not saying jack support wouldn't be bad. Anyway, their new project Unison is designed with jack in mind
In any case I'm not saying jack support wouldn't be bad. Anyway, their new project Unison is designed with jack in mind
- Louigi Verona
- Established Member
- Posts: 402
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 8:56 am
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: In what way modular approach is limiting
I plan to write an article soon on how I see a perfect modular sequencer, since my views on how I see a perfect integrated music environment are well known already.