Preach on!linuxdsp wrote:...I would rather see more open formats and standards rather than specifically open software...
Closed formats and standards are created by shortsighted greed and fear.
Moderators: raboof, MattKingUSA, khz
Preach on!linuxdsp wrote:...I would rather see more open formats and standards rather than specifically open software...
Probably true, but with open-source you are enabled to maintain it yourself. In a way you are a part owner of the "company". You can impact its future more than a single paying customer typically can. Its not a huge difference because often users lack the skill and/or time to do so, but I think it gives a bit of an edge to OSS in this regard. I agree with all your points, I just wanted to point out that with closed source you are 100% dependent upon others, open source you theoretically aren't. Sometimes the commercial licence agreement releases the company from liability anyway, they COULD take your money and run, luckily companies know this is the worst business model and they ethically maintain and support their software.linuxdsp wrote:I think the risks of depending upon either are about equal - you just pay in different ways
Because I'd much rather spend a week tracking down unstable beta versions of all the required dependencies for some open source application, hidden away in a dark corner of some unkown developers sourceforge page, along with several dead links to git repositories that have been abandoned, only to finally get it to build and discover it doesn't work properly.Such a problem arises from the software being proprietary
Well I've tried both online and offline registering to no avail. Mind telling me how you did it?aprzekaz wrote:There was something I found about registering an offline computer I found in the manual or on the website that eventually worked.
linuxdsp wrote:
Because I'd much rather spend a week tracking down unstable beta versions of all the required dependencies for some open source application, hidden away in a dark corner of some unkown developers sourceforge page, along with several dead links to git repositories that have been abandoned, only to finally get it to build and discover it doesn't work properly.
Yes, and the reason I made the comment was precisely to illustrate that you can't say "open source good" vs "closed source bad" especialy not just based on a single comment - open source projects (can) go wrong in the ways I described - from my own bitter personal experience of countless lost hours...What about Ardour? (or Qtractor, or LMMS) it seems to work pretty well out of the box with no unlocking or anything. It's also packaged ready to run with many audio distros which is how I got it. They do ask for some money which is totally reasonable in my opinion. Maybe this discussion is for a different thread tho.