general stability of sequencers

Support & discussion regarding DAWs and MIDI sequencers.

Moderators: MattKingUSA, khz

urlwolf
Established Member
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 11:57 pm

general stability of sequencers

Post by urlwolf »

I'm using ardour 3 (great daw!) with triceratops. It crashes every few mins.
Trying muse 2.1, it doesn't seem to even load synths, no matter what plugin types. IRC is a ghost city.

What is the most stable sequencer? Hopefully one that has an active community.
User avatar
autostatic
Established Member
Posts: 1994
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 5:26 pm
Location: Beverwijk, The Netherlands
Has thanked: 32 times
Been thanked: 104 times
Contact:

Re: general stability of sequencers

Post by autostatic »

I second falkTX, so Qtractor or seq24 for step sequencing.
tux99
Established Member
Posts: 346
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2012 10:42 am
Contact:

Re: general stability of sequencers

Post by tux99 »

I use Rosegarden and I can't recall that it has ever crashed on me.
urlwolf
Established Member
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 11:57 pm

Re: general stability of sequencers

Post by urlwolf »

After upgrading to muse 2.1.1 it doesn't even start.
I'm starting to think the avg. software quality around here is on par with Chinesse umbrellas...
nils
Established Member
Posts: 538
Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2008 9:05 pm
Has thanked: 35 times
Been thanked: 94 times
Contact:

Re: general stability of sequencers

Post by nils »

Have you tried turning it off and on again?
danboid
Established Member
Posts: 1327
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 11:28 am
Location: England
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: general stability of sequencers

Post by danboid »

qtractor is the most stable, and the most responsive FLOSS Linux DAW in my experience - even though the RNCBC will likely emerge to remind us its still ALPHA software, which supposedly it is but its more stable for me than a lot of programs who have long since passed 1.0.
alex stone
Established Member
Posts: 351
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 7:39 am
Has thanked: 67 times
Been thanked: 53 times

Re: general stability of sequencers

Post by alex stone »

urlwolf wrote:After upgrading to muse 2.1.1 it doesn't even start.
I'm starting to think the avg. software quality around here is on par with Chinesse umbrellas...

Works for me, all day every day, and it's my guess that my projects are far larger generally than most.


Alex.
tripomatic
Established Member
Posts: 141
Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 4:42 pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: general stability of sequencers

Post by tripomatic »

I compiled triceratops v0.1.6c and load it in ardour 3 (compiled from git).
It's working like it should be.

Maybe because i compiled both against same libraries.
On Ardour site, there also problem with eq10q that some have with a beta.
I'm also the only one that has no problems till now, probably because i also compiled it
with the same libraries as ardour.
Overthere they think that crashed are caused by incompatibility or something like that(i'm no programmer)
https://community.ardour.org/node/7042
User avatar
AnthonyCFox
Established Member
Posts: 393
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2013 3:50 pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: general stability of sequencers

Post by AnthonyCFox »

Non-sequencer is super stable unless you tell it to do something it doesn't want to do, e.g. duplicate patterns or move ranges of notes. In which case it crashes immediately. So when you figure out not to do those things; it's great. :lol:
War, crime, disease, starvation, extreme poverty; these are serious things.
Music? Not so serious. Have some fun! :D
User avatar
bluebell
Established Member
Posts: 1924
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2012 11:44 am
Location: Saarland, Germany
Has thanked: 112 times
Been thanked: 119 times

Re: general stability of sequencers

Post by bluebell »

urlwolf wrote:I'm using ardour 3 (great daw!) with triceratops. It crashes every few mins.
Trying muse 2.1, it doesn't seem to even load synths, no matter what plugin types. IRC is a ghost city.

What is the most stable sequencer? Hopefully one that has an active community.
Rosegarden is stable enough to work with – except for recording audio files and deleting them in many cycles. That doesn't bother me since I record audio files in Audacity and import the properly cut files in Rosegarden.

Linux – MOTU UltraLite AVB – Qtractor – http://suedwestlicht.saar.de/

tatch
Established Member
Posts: 662
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2012 3:18 pm

Re: general stability of sequencers

Post by tatch »

AnthonyCFox wrote:Non-sequencer is super stable unless you tell it to do something it doesn't want to do, e.g. duplicate patterns or move ranges of notes. In which case it crashes immediately. So when you figure out not to do those things; it's great. :lol:
I'm waiting for male to push out his non-seq rewrite. The old one doesn't keep time correctly on my computer for some reason, it drifts pretty noticeably, and I also can't adjust patterns I input with my keyboard so it's sort of unusable for me at the moment. Really looking forward to the new one though (at the very least it looks terrific).
User avatar
bluebell
Established Member
Posts: 1924
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2012 11:44 am
Location: Saarland, Germany
Has thanked: 112 times
Been thanked: 119 times

Re: general stability of sequencers

Post by bluebell »

tatch wrote: I'm waiting for male to push out his non-seq rewrite. The old one doesn't keep time correctly on my computer for some reason, it drifts pretty noticeably, and I also can't adjust patterns I input with my keyboard so it's sort of unusable for me at the moment. Really looking forward to the new one though (at the very least it looks terrific).
I had a getting-faster-and-slower problem with Rosegarden. It looks as if the Linux kernel timer had a problem with Turboboost (not with Speedstep). Switching Turboboost off in BIOS helps.

Linux – MOTU UltraLite AVB – Qtractor – http://suedwestlicht.saar.de/

male
Established Member
Posts: 232
Joined: Tue May 22, 2012 5:45 pm

Re: general stability of sequencers

Post by male »

bluebell wrote:
tatch wrote: I'm waiting for male to push out his non-seq rewrite. The old one doesn't keep time correctly on my computer for some reason, it drifts pretty noticeably, and I also can't adjust patterns I input with my keyboard so it's sort of unusable for me at the moment. Really looking forward to the new one though (at the very least it looks terrific).
I had a getting-faster-and-slower problem with Rosegarden. It looks as if the Linux kernel timer had a problem with Turboboost (not with Speedstep). Switching Turboboost off in BIOS helps.
This kind of thing shouldn't affect JACK MIDI, though. Of course I'd need a lot more information about the situation to get to the bottom of it. I've never had any such problem, but, of course, I'm probably using a different set of synths etc.
Image
tnovelli
Established Member
Posts: 277
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 4:52 pm

Re: general stability of sequencers

Post by tnovelli »

AutoStatic wrote:I second falkTX, so Qtractor or seq24 for step sequencing.
Yep, Qtractor is nice and solid. I seq24's step-sequencing (arrow keys to move cursor, MIDI keyboard to enter a note).... but Qtractor doesn't have that yet, does it?? That would be awesome.
User avatar
autostatic
Established Member
Posts: 1994
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 5:26 pm
Location: Beverwijk, The Netherlands
Has thanked: 32 times
Been thanked: 104 times
Contact:

Re: general stability of sequencers

Post by autostatic »

No it doesn't and it probably never will, it's a timeline-based sequencer (if that's the correct term).
Post Reply